tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30682564.post6861742719660770048..comments2023-10-06T12:59:27.150+00:00Comments on Scientific Misconduct Blog: Misconduct roundup 17 May 09Aubrey Blumsohnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14702477777798565371noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30682564.post-55607713843912675732009-05-18T13:56:00.000+00:002009-05-18T13:56:00.000+00:00"It seems obvious that "investigations" of scienti..."It seems obvious that "investigations" of scientific misconduct should themselves align with the usual principles of scientific discourse (open discussion, honesty, transparency of method, public disclosure of evidence, open public analysis, and public discussion of reasoning underlying any conclusion)."<br /><br />Hooray - well said. The problem in a nutshell.Vijinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30682564.post-62271226437735055092009-05-18T09:26:00.000+00:002009-05-18T09:26:00.000+00:00The Research Integrity Panel is dominated by a law...The Research Integrity Panel is dominated by a lawyer. As I can make out, he knows nothing about either science or research fraud.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30682564.post-88092560578870518712009-05-18T07:59:00.000+00:002009-05-18T07:59:00.000+00:00Why is the government silent in this type of cases...Why is the government silent in this type of cases.They should understand that its a very sensitive issue and act accordingly.<br /><br /><br />Thanks<br />NeoNeonoreply@blogger.com