Scientific Misconduct Blog

About all manner of pharmaceutical scientific misconduct, bad science, and related curious incidents. If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Pharmaceutical Dilbert of the day (3)



Earlier|Later|Main Page
Posted by Aubrey Blumsohn at 6/10/2007 05:12:00 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Dilbert

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Pages

  • Home

Blog Archive

  • ►  2010 (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2009 (18)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (2)
  • ►  2008 (107)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2007 (123)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (23)
    • ►  October (41)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ▼  June (8)
      • This blog is R rated
      • The path of least resistance and the case of Profe...
      • Ink-Blot test for a new kind of science
      • Our wings fell off
      • Pharmaceutical Dilbert of the day (3)
      • Speaking under the influence? - a note to Nelson ...
      • Safe medicine, whistleblowing and the Monogomphe
      • Root Strikers
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2006 (43)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (18)

Contributors

  • Aubrey Blumsohn
  • DRI
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.